Mazda MX-5 RF v Toyota 86 2017 Comparison

Same, same but different
The fourth-generation Mazda MX-5 continues to build on its worldwide success. In this Retractable Fastback (or RF) guise it’s quite the game-changer, debuting the Japanese manufacturer’s first run at a retractable hard top for its sporty icon.

The Toyota 86 is not without its share of loyal followers Down Under, and the most recent updates see this solid performer lift its game in all the right ways.

A successful, affordable sports car offering from both Mazda and Toyota, these two rivals have traditionally tallied similar sales figures in Australia – nearly 18,000 since 2013 for the 86 and just over 19,000 since 1989 for the MX-5.

At first glance, it seems like the showy MX-5 RF has an unfair advantage over the Toyota 86. But compared spec for spec, tested back-to-back, and lovingly flogged, the battle was far closer than we expected.

Why are we comparing them?
Mazda’s introduction of a folding hard top coincides with an updated Toyota 86; so it was time to throw them together to see how their respective changes play out, not only dynamically, but also their every day functionality and value for money… because these days we want it all.

Both share 2.0-litre four-cylinder engines and shoot power to the rear wheels. Their light weight, six-speed manual transmissions, and agile handling combine for an enthusiastic steer that motoring purists crave.

But comparisons are all encompassing and we’re keen to find out which one ticks the most boxes taking into account matters of the head, the heart, and the hip-pocket.

Who will they appeal to?
We’re not about to judge, because we know there are many reasons you may choose a pint-sized sports car. But it’s unlikely to include modern family affairs.

Undoubtedly, fun behind the wheel is up there. In theory, the Mazda MX-5 RF GT and Toyota 86 GT are likely to attract similar buyers, thanks to that one defining characteristic… and many similarities.

The direct-injection MX-5 delivers 118kW/200Nm compared to Toyota 86’s more powerful 152kW/212Nm.

Electrically-assisted steering and four-wheel disc brakes close the gap, but the Mazda rides on 17-inch alloys and the 86 is fitted with 16s. The Toyota is shod with Yokahama dB 205/55 tyres while the Mazda rolls on a slightly slimmer 205/45 Bridgestone Potenzas. The Yokohama proved preferable in both grip and noise levels.

Dimensionally, there’s not much in it. On the inside, however, they are worlds apart.

While the Mazda’s comfortable seats and wind-in-the-hair joy is hard to match, you’re limited to just two occupants – and open the door for many selfish, mid-life crisis accusations.

The 86 on the other hand has room for four occupants (just) and betters the Mazda by nearly 10cm for front of cabin width.

Better still, it has nearly twice the boot capacity of the MX-5 (218 litres v 127) and the second row can fold flat, too – hello golf clubs!

The Toyota 86 takes practical considerations to the next level with its interior space and useful incidental storage. All the while, your MX-5 passenger will be slightly contorted as they grab for their coffee and undoubtedly share a foot well with at least one bag.

If it’s eye-candy and not functionality you’re after however, the Mazda’s tactile and more sophisticated interior is the one for you.

How much do they cost?
While this is not a comparison of cost and value, price still plays an important factor. The Toyota 86 range is priced from $30,790 to $38,790 while the Mazda MX-5 RF range starts at $38,550 and tops out at $46,890.

Both vehicles are available in manual or auto, and of course, the transmission choice is all yours. But we think the manuals are the pick in both vehicle.

The Toyota 86 has a more Spartan interior that the MX-5 and in base form, lacks a trip computer and satellite navigation which is standard in all MX-5 RF models. However, the biggest omission on the MX-5 is the lack of a reversing camera. The Toyota 86 includes a camera on every model.

Each manufacturer charges a premium for metallic paint. Mazda’s is the more affordable at a $300 cost while Toyota will charge you $450.

Each manufacturer also offers a standard three-year warranty. But Toyota’s is capped at 100,000km whereas Mazda is unlimited.

The 86’s first four services are capped at $180 per service for the first three years or 60,000km. Servicing the MX-5 will cost more with servicing for the first five years alternating between $299 and $341, depending on distance travelled.

According to RedBook the Mazda will be worth 51 per cent less than its new car price after three years ownership, compared to just a 26 per cent loss for the Toyota.

What do they do well?
Each vehicle is an accomplished sports car, offering the same fun in different packages. The Toyota has a raw feel and because it develops its torque higher up the rev range, it needs a bit more right foot to keep it cranking so it is engaging the driver.

The MX-5 RF on the other hand offers more low down torque and will hold higher gears in corners, so you don’t feel like you’re having to work the car so hard.

Steering feel is en pointe so it is still engaging, just in a different way.

The Mazda’s supreme weight distribution creates a truly planted ride, bettering that of the occasionally twitchy 86. Combined with a more natural throw to its short shifting gearbox, the MX-5 is easier and more fun to drive.

Performance testing was little help in determining a ‘better’ vehicle. The MX-5 RF was fractions of a second faster than the 86 in the sprint from 0-100km/h, and nearly identical under brakes.

The Toyota 86 bests the Mazda on space and practicality while the Mazda offers a more refined cabin.

The Mazda’s roof is as spectacular as the Porsche 911 Targa at a fraction of the price, while the Toyota 86 has an understated look that can be modified by owners.

What could they do better?
Road noise in the Mazda is significant, with tyre noise much more intrusive than that of the Toyota 86. And it also drew criticism from both judges for lack of useful oddment storage and the lack of a reversing camera was a constant disappointment.

In base form, the Toyota 86 fell short on cabin refinement – lower quality fit and finish in particular – and it lacks some creature comforts.

It’s fair to say however the minor ‘shortcomings’ of these two rivals are effortlessly quashed by sheer enjoyment at the wheel.

Which wins, and why?
There’s not much to pick between the two and their distinct offerings will most likely see a fairly even split in sales… particularly if history is anything to go by.

On a straight price comparison, it would probably be the Toyota 86 that took the win for hip-pocket appeal, but all things considered – refinement, driveability and feel at the wheel – it’s the Mazda MX-5 RF that takes the crown this time.

With both cars nailing the desired grins behind the wheel, it’s the MX-5 that offers a more engaging and sophisticated driving experience overall, winning votes of both the head and the heart. We just wish it came with a reversing camera.

2017 Mazda MX-5 RF GT pricing and specifications:
Price: $43,890 (plus on-road costs)
Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol
Output: 118kW/200Nm
Transmission: Six-speed manual
Fuel: 7.0L/100km (ADR Combined)
CO2: N/A (ADR Combined)
Safety Rating: Five-star ANCAP

2017 Toyota 86 GT pricing and specifications:
Price: $30,790 (plus on-road costs)
Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol
Output: 152kW/212Nm
Transmission: Six-speed manual
Fuel: 7.8L/100km (ADR Combined)
CO2: 181g/km (ADR Combined)
Safety Rating: Five-star ANCAP

Performance Testing:
Mazda MX-5 RF GT:
0-100km/h: 8.3sec
60-0km/h: 13.6m

Toyota 86 GT:
0-100km/h: 8.7sec
60-0km/h: 13.9m