ge5327290081739245321
1
Geoffrey Harris22 Dec 2008
NEWS

MOTORSPORT: The V8 Supercar TV slide

Authoritative evidence that V8 Supercars slipped almost 11.5 per cent on TV in Australia's major cities this year, and that the decline in those markets is now close to 22 per cent in four years. And just what is the meaning of growth in Australia's premier series?

By the TV industry standard V8 Supercars have lost a lot of ground
Two weeks on from the conclusion of the V8 Supercar Championship something has come into focus. It's the TV picture.

Someone with far easier access to the Oztam data over the years than us has done some homework for us. Far easier and quicker it was than us labouring for days over summer to unearth and analyse that data.

Rather than the "unduplicated" figure of 7.7 million Australian viewers that the Seven Network was talking about after the Oran Park finale, or the 22 million that V8 Supercars Australia was crowing about after the 2007 season (for our previous commentaries on those numbers, see here and here), our contact has got back to the industry standard -- the average audience.

And, based on this research, the average audiences in the five major Australian capital cities for V8 Supercars for the past five seasons, were:
2008    434,000
2007    490,000
2006    504,000
2005    556,000
2004    554,000

Now what these numbers -- the average audiences across all rounds of each of those seasons -- tell us, without having gone back further than five years, is that 2005 was the peak in terms of the five major cities.

V8 Supercars were telecast on the Ten Network for a decade up until 2006, and since then have been back on the Seven Network, where the Australian Touring Car Championship traditionally was.

These numbers look good for Ten, but as they are only for the five capitals they overlook the greater regional reach of the Seven Network.

That aside, the simple table above shows that V8 Supercars were down 11.42 per cent this year on Seven in the five capitals -- from 490,000 in '07 to 434,000.

That is in line with the trend we were seeing in research from the Mitchells agency on which we've commented regularly this year (and links to some which are contained within the second link above).

On this table the 2007 audience on Seven was down 2.97 per cent, from 504,000 to 490,000 in '06, but remember again that these numbers are for the five major cities.

It is generally agreed that the national audience picked up in '07 when the telecasts moved from Ten to Seven because of the latter's broader national reach.

But, perhaps most importantly, what the table shows us is the five-capital audience has declined 21.94 per cent in three years -- from 556,000 in '05 to 434,000 in '08.

Now that has got to be a worry for the sport.

Just what is a growth measuring stick?
It is against that background that we are amazed at some of the twaddle talked in our "cousin" Auto Action magazine's V8 Supercar Summit -- a six-page transcript of a forum of some of the sport's "heavy hitters" which appears in the year-ending edition 1321 of AA.

We found the time to read this spread over the weekend; indeed we read it twice.

The participants in the "summit" were Ford driver James Courtney, championship-winning Team Vodafone principal Roland Dane, Ford Performance Racing race engineer Phil Keed, Walkinshaw Racing chief executive Craig Wilson, Jack Daniel's sponsorship/brand manager Andrew McNamara, media and communications company managing director and PR operative David Segal, and journalists Paul Gover of News Corp and Michael Lynch from Fairfax, chaired by AA editor-at-large Mark Fogarty.

On our two readings of the transcript we cannot find any mention of television. Yet surely TV is the barometer of the health of V8 Supercar racing?

Towards the end of the transcript a couple of the participants, Courtney and Gover, talk about growth in V8 Supercars.

They say it won't be what it has been in the past five years. But what growth are they talking about?

We gather Courtney is going to have quite substantial growth in his pay packet as he moves from Stone Brothers to Jim Beam Racing next season -- and good luck to him for that.

We don't doubt that Roland Dane has seen growth in the revenues of his Triple Eight Race Engineering in recent years, on the back of its success with three Bathurst 1000 wins and now a V8 Supercar Championship with Jamie Whincup.

And we don't doubt that V8 Supercars Australia's revenues from the fees it charges circuits to host rounds of the championship have been rising steadily.

But we're perplexed by the references to growth in what we presume was meant to be the "sport" of V8 Supercars over the past five years.

There has been growth in the TV rights fee that Seven is paying -- quite a multiple, supposedly, of what Ten was paying but distorted somewhat by including the cost of telecast productions by V8SA's own TV unit now.

Strip away all the bulldust and the two measures of the sport are crowds at the tracks and the TV audience.

Attendance figures are notoriously fuzzy in Australian motorsport, and while crowds are respectable in V8 Supercar racing -- and pretty much always have been -- what serious, credible evidence is there of improvement (i.e. growth) in recent years -- and in particular this year?

Certainly not, for one, at the 500km lead-up to Bathurst, held this year at Phillip Island. And certainly not on the TV screens in the five major cities that we alluded to in our opening item and table above.

Now how can nine people within the sport get together for a summit and not face up to such reality? Our recommendation to our "cousins" at Auto Action is that in future editor-at-large Fogarty be a full participating member of the forum rather than just the questioner.

One voice that makes a fair bit of sense
The one voice we felt made a valuable contribution to the summit was Team Vodafone's Roland Dane.

Here are a few excerpts of his wisdom:

<<< "We have very substantial appearance money payments which go to the teams if they fulfil their obligations. And that's the framework which holds us together and that will be enormously important over the next year." (Our comment: perhaps a very good and overlooked, little-understood point).

<<< "It (Ford versus Holden) is increasingly irrelevant ... the most common car that somebody drives to a V8 Supercar race in Australia is a Toyota." (Our comment: we disagree with the initial remark, and believe it to be typical of the dismissive attitude of many in the V8 Supercar community to the importance of the participarting manufacturers and reflective of the increasing distance between Dane's team and Ford, while the latter point, re Toyota, is very pertinent).

<<< "It's a crying shame that there isn't a world-class circuit in WA ... one day somebody at Queensland Raceway will take a Komatsu digger and make it more interesting ... we need to keep on having the permanent circuits (as well as street circuits) but hopefully persuading them to up their game." (Our comment: what a pleasant load of common sense. In our view, a world-class permanent circuit in WA might ultimately be a way of keeping a Formula 1 world championship round in Australia, as well as providing a western home for V8 Supercars and other forms of racing. Dane will get universal agreement on Queensland Raceway, and it's pleasing to hear a powerbroker with an appreciation of the importance of permanent circuits in the motorsport landscape).

<<< "What the governments are putting in (to street races) in terms of our racing is tiny, and the returns are very evident." (Our comment: not sure we see the "very evident" value/return on investment that Dane does, but we note that -- unlike some others in the sport -- he refrains from blatantly outlandish claims).

<<< "In terms of its (the V8 Supercar business) structure and how it's managed, it's not at the moment. The old management stayed around too long." (Our comment: interesting that such perspective, obviously kept in-house for a long time, seeps out after the recent change of management guard. We note that Walkinshaw Racing's Wilson said "the people that were involved in management overstayed their time by one or two or three years".)

<<< "Apart from cricket there is nothing that goes to every state and territory in this country and for our sponsors and the media that's a very valuable asset that we have." (Our comment: a very good and often-overlooked point).

So, although we have lamented here regularly that what is still essentially Australia's touring car championship is dominated by foreign-owned teams (Dane's Team Voadfone, Ford Performance Racing and Walkinshaw Performance's Holden Racing Team), we admit that Dane talks a fair bit of sense.

Much of it's common sense. And, as we've said before, the only problem with common sense is that it's not common enough, unfortunately.


Away with the fairies
There was talk by other participants in the summit of making V8 Supercar racing more family-friendly and about trying to connect with new immigrants to Australia.

Pie in the sky stuff, we reckon. Just try to contemplate increasingly environmentally-conscious young mums in Australia's suburbia or regional areas entertaining, in great numbers, taking their young kids to noisy, fuel-guzzling, "dinosaur" motor racing. Let's get real.

And history tells us that immigrants, particularly the poorer ones, have a much greater priority in their new country -- getting on their feet financially -- before they think of traipsing out to a motor racing circuit. Even a downtown street race.

Also, as much as there is still a substantial body of people in Oz (mainly older men) who love watching V8 Supercar racing, the sport needs to be not only asking itself but deciding what relevance V8s will have in five, seven or 10 years -- and how Australia's premier  motorsport can be recast to at least retain its existing audience numbers and provide some attraction for manufacturers (existing or new participants).

As we said earlier amid the Roland Dane remarks, we detect a lack of respect within the V8 Supercar community for the role of the manufacturers in the sport.

Dane is obviously confident his Team Vodafone can continue on its winning ways without Ford financial support, but the wider V8 Supercar fraternity might not be so dismissive if suddenly the participating manufacturers chose not to participate any longer.

Ferrari serve for Bernie and the little guy hits back
The Formula 1 costs debate/issue is getting ugly. Even dirty.

After considerable agreement on slashing the cost of running cars and teams, the focus is now turning to Bernie Ecclestone's take from the sport.

Ferrari chief Luca di Montezemolo has stepped up his push to unlock more of the pie for the teams, even suggesting 78-year-old Ecclestone's time may be up ("sooner or later he has to stop"), that the sport doesn't need a dictator, and wanting a say in the calendar because of there no longer being a grand prix in North America and the introduction of soulless new events as traditional venues struggle to remain viable.

Traditionally Ecclestone took about 70 per cent of F1's race fee and TV rights income with the teams getting 30 per cent. In recent years the split between Ecclestone (and his highly-geared private equity partner CVC) and the teams has been closer to 50-50.

But Montezemolo has said: "We want to know more about the revenues."

Ecclestone countered: "They have the right to send people into the company and search for everything ... (but) they've never done it."

And, ever the poker player, Ecclestone revealed for the first time the size of the payment Ferrari got under a 2003 deal to stick with F1 rather than be party to a rival Grand Prix World Championship owned and run by car manufacturers.

"They (Ferrari) get about US$80 million more. When they win the constructors' championship, which they did this year, they got US$80 million more than if McLaren had won it," Ecclestone told the London newspaper he so often uses as his mouthpiece, The Times.

And he was unashamedly open about how he kept Ferrari in F1 in the face of the GPWC threat five years ago.

"We 'bought' Ferrari. We 'bought' Ferrari's loyalty. Our deal with Ferrari was that we 'bought' them so they would not go to the others," he said.

There are signs now from Montezemolo that Ferrari may be prepared to give up its larger share of the cake for a greater share of the F1 revenues for the teams overall.

And, in a sign of how the debate is getting down to the fundamentals, Montezemolo said: "It is our business."

Reminds us of one of our all-time favourite quotes, from former F1 team owner Eddie Jordan, who said something to the effect that "Bernie has sold F1 three or four times over, and he never owned it in the first place!"

Montezemolo perspectives on Raikkonen and Alonso
The F1 cost-containment measures are also inevitably raising questions about whether the massive salaries of the top drivers might get cut.

That aside for now, Montezemolo has had some interesting comments on the two we believe to be the sport's top two earners of recent times -- Ferrari's 2007 world champion Kimi Raikkonen, who mysteriously went off the boil in mid, even early, 2008 (certainly in terms of race results, even if he kept setting fastest laps), and Renault's 2005-06 world champion Fernando Alonso, who has often been linked to a Ferrari drive.

"I joke that we had Kimi until Magny Cours (the French GP), then he was busy and he asked a friend of his to drive," Montezemolo said. "This friend was a very good driver. He put on Kimi's helmet, but now we finally have the proper Kimi back again.

"For a while he looked like a centre forward who wasn't scoring goals, but as soon as he did you knew he would be OK again."

And of Alonso, for whom he cannot see a Ferrari slot for before 2011, Montezemolo said: "He's a fantastic driver, no question. I like him.

"Particularly in Japan (this year) he drove a great race. He's a champion and a team leader, but for the moment we don't have any problem with our drivers. That is why we confirmed officially Massa and Kimi until the end of 2010.

"Life is long and in the future we will see, but for the moment we don't have any grey areas regarding drivers for the next two years."

Prodrive's Richards admits F1 interest
Still no visible signs of how the Honda F1 team sale/closure is going to pan out, but we note that Prodrive's David Richards, who we have always believed to be the most likely buyer, has given a hint.

"We're very interested (in F1) if F1's going to address the costs issue," said Richards, who previously ran the Honda and Benetton teams briefly but with moderate success.

"Maybe that is another opportunity for Prodrive (having just lost its long-time World Rally Championship client Subaru, which has pulled out of world rallying)."

It looks to us as though any Honda F1 sale will come in a flurry just ahead of the New Year's Eve deadline.

A major blow-up for Mecachrome
Remember Mecachrome, the company that provided Renault-based F1 engines to the likes of the Benetton team and British American Racing when Renault was out of F1?

Mecachrome was a French company that became Canadian last year and moved its head office to Montreal while operating 11 engineering plants in France and Canada.

Its shares traded at C$14 on listing but recently got down as low as 10 cents. Now, after a big third quarter loss, it is seeking protection from its creditors.
 
Motor City left without its major motor race
A sure sign of the downturn in the motor industry amid the world financial crisis.

The Detroit Belle Island Grand Prix, an Indy Racing League round in America's Motor City, revived just last year, has been scrubbed from the 2009 IRL calendar.

Despite the popularity and perceived success of the street race, with Roger "The Captain" Penske its driving force, it was considered next September 4-6's event, along with an American Le Mans Series sports car series round, would have looked indulgent in a deep recession.

It has all been put on what has diplomatically been called "pause".

NASCAR discrimination case ends, quietly
The US$225 million discrimination lawsuit a black woman who was formerly a NASCAR official brought against the American stock car governing body has been settled.

But neither NASCAR nor the woman, Mauricia Grant, is revealing the terms. Grant had alleged dozens of instances of racial and gender discrimination and harassment.

She claimed to have been called "Nappy Headed Mo" and to have been subjected to indecent exposure by two male officials, who have since been dismissed.

NASCAR claimed Grant was sacked for lack of work performance and that she should have reported the alleged discrimination and harassment to her bosses immediately. She claimed to have been fired for reporting it.

Anyway, case closed. Secretly. Situation pretty normal.

Share this article
Written byGeoffrey Harris
See all articles
Our team of independent expert car reviewers and journalists
Meet the team
Stay up to dateBecome a carsales member and get the latest news, reviews and advice straight to your inbox.
Subscribe today
Sell your car with Instant Offer™
Like trade-in but price is regularly higher
1. Get a free Instant Offer™ online in minutes2. An official local dealer will inspect your car3. Finalise the details and get paid the next business day
Get a free Instant Offer
Sell your car with Instant Offer™
Disclaimer
Please see our Editorial Guidelines & Code of Ethics (including for more information about sponsored content and paid events). The information published on this website is of a general nature only and doesn’t consider your particular circumstances or needs.
Love every move.
Buy it. Sell it.Love it.
®
Scan to download the carsales app
    DownloadAppCta
    AppStoreDownloadGooglePlayDownload
    Want more info? Here’s our app landing page App Store and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.
    © carsales.com.au Pty Ltd 1999-2025
    In the spirit of reconciliation we acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.