Tesla Model 3 RWD v Mazda 6e GT 2026 Comparison

Mazda has come out swinging with the sub-$50k price of its Chinese-born, Japanese-finessed offering. However, Tesla is swinging harder, slashing $9000 off the price of the Premium RWD for its new price-leading Tesla Model 3. Game on.

The 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD is now the new entry-level variant at $45,900 (all prices are before on-road costs). And yes, that’s even with Full Self-Driving Supervised (FSD) as standard rather than a circa-$10k option – although you must pay a monthly subscription to use it.

Elon Musk’s American-designed Model 3 undercuts the 2026 Mazda 6e GT, which starts at $49,990. Given Mazda was previously reluctant to embrace electrification over internal combustion, the battery-packed sedan (technically it’s a liftback) is only possible because of the brand’s longstanding 20-year relationship with Changan Auto.

Yet, as the quasi-replacement for the venerable Mazda6, the 6e has big shoes to fill.

And while eyebrows were initially raised by the announcement of its Chinese underpinnings, the reality is there likely wouldn’t be a Mazda offering in this space if it weren’t for platform sharing.

Ironically, the Model 3 RWD lands on Australian shores via Tesla’s Chinese Gigafactory in Shanghai. If you want to retain the features taken out of this base car, the $54,990 Premium RWD remains, as do the Long Range and Performance variants.

The Mazda doesn’t get much fancier than the GT, but the $52,990 top-spec Atenza packs in Nappa leather and suede interior accents. As a side note, it’s hard to ignore the Toyota Camry as a rival in this segment.

In terms of warranty, both are covered by an industry-average five-year/unlimited-kilometre plan, with the batteries gaining eight years/160,000km. The pair also come with five years of roadside assistance.

For servicing, the Mazda requires a yearly check-up (or every 20,000km – whichever comes first). However, with the Tesla being a Tesla, servicing is condition-based, meaning the app will tell you when attention is required. A benefit of buying the Mazda is the extensive dealership network – especially in country areas.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but through the lens of those bringing you this comparison test, the Tesla isn’t the looker. In fact, with its Pearl White hue and ‘Prismata’ plastic aero trims covering 18-inch steel wheels, it has more than a whiff of rideshare about it.

Sat next to the 2026 Mazda 6e GT, it lacks the design detail and intricacy of its Japanese rival. Which is a triumph for the Mazda considering it’s a light reskin.

Further proof of its attractive lines is the fact the 6e won the 2026 World Car Design of the Year award – impressive stuff.

With the new base model Tesla, it’s more about what you don’t get because of the price cut that could make all the difference. Its suspension misses out on frequency selective dampers, while 19-inch wheels, a powered steering column, front-seat ventilation, rear-seat heating and ambient lighting also fall off the equipment list.

The upholstery is now a mix of synthetic leather and cloth, while some materials have been downgraded – like plastic speaker covers instead of metal. The speaker count also drops to seven.

Powered seat adjustment moves from physical controls to the central touchscreen, too. That’s one way to pinch pennies.

However, it isn’t bereft of kit. Like the 6e, the Model 3 RWD retains LED head- and tail-lights, front-seat heating, a heated steering wheel, powered front seats, a powered tailgate, a fixed panoramic glass roof (sans shade) and climate control, albeit only single-zone.

Which means the circa-$4k premium to step up to the Mazda 6e over the Model 3 could prove worthwhile. Its cabin is cloaked in Mazda’s Maztex leatherette, while the front pews are heated and ventilated. They also offer 10-way adjustment for the driver with memory and four-way for the passenger.

Other features include an opening panoramic glass sunroof with blackout shade, tri-zone climate control, 64-colour ambient lighting and a powered tow bar that extends and retracts at a tap of the central touchscreen. You can also opt for a light beige interior hue for $1000 if black isn’t to your liking.

In terms of how the cars are perceived on the road, if a white Tesla doesn’t tickle your fancy there’s also Diamond Black and Stealth Grey to choose from. However, they aren’t cheap at $1500 and $1900 respectively. As for the 6e, our tester is painted in $595 Machine Grey metallic, which is a bargain in comparison.

Both the 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD and Mazda 6e GT carry five-star ANCAP safety ratings (2025). In fact, the Model 3 received the second-highest rating of any car tested by the independent safety body in 2025 – beaten only by the Model Y. Big praise right there.

Common to both are active safety systems like autonomous emergency braking, blind-spot warning, speed-sign recognition, lane-departure warning, lane-keep assistance, driver monitoring and adaptive cruise control. The pair use a 360-degree monitor as well as a rear-view camera and sensors, but only the Model 3 can park itself.

In practice, the Model 3’s active safety systems are relatively innocuous, apart from a loud audible warning if you stray over unbroken lines. Otherwise, it quite literally drives itself when using cruise control – see the next section for more details.

The Mazda doesn’t offer the same experience. The semi-autonomous mode for the adaptive cruise control is virtually unusable, as it’s either tugging the steering wheel out of your hands to stay within the lane or getting angry at you for not driving between the lines.

The workaround is to use Mazda Radar Cruise Control (MRCC) instead, a selection that can be made within the ADAS settings on the infotainment screen. After doing so, the calibration becomes more forgiving. Thankfully, the 6e GT’s driver monitoring isn’t a taskmaster and you can create your own custom preferences linked to a shortcut on the multi-function steering wheel.

While it might seem a little unfair to spruik the FSD technology in this comparison given it’s unique to the 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD, we can’t gloss over it.

Yes, it’s essentially ‘standard equipment’ on the entry grade in terms of the hardware required to enable. it, but you must pay a $149 monthly subscription to activate it – or $1788 per year. There’s no doubt FSD is remarkable, space-age tech, but you still need to remain engaged as the ‘driver’ at all times.

Hence, the addition of ‘Supervised’ to the branding isn’t mere lip service.

After recent updates, FSD also offers different modes, including Sloth, Chill, Standard and Hurry. They’re largely self-explanatory, and Hurry does exactly what it says. It’s trying to mimic human behaviour, but it can sometimes feel as though the system is getting too confident.

What it can’t do is swerve for potholes – something any Aussie driver is becoming all too familiar with. FSD can, on the odd occasion, read the speed limit wrong and position itself in the ‘fast’ lane, holding up traffic. In Hurry mode, it also likes to leave moving into a freeway exit lane until the last minute.

However, while you do need to ‘supervise’ as it isn’t infallible, when it all works perfectly the technology is mighty impressive. Even some insurers are seeing it as a safety benefit.

Aside from FSD, the entry-level Model 3 uses an upgraded 16.0-inch infotainment screen with Tesla’s proprietary Linux-based operating system. And yes, while you can connect your phone via Bluetooth, there’s no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto.

It’s also frustrating that there’s no instrument cluster or head-up display. The speedometer is located on the central touchscreen.

The 2026 Mazda 6e GT doesn’t have a headliner like FSD in the tech department, but it isn’t totally outclassed. The 14.6-inch infotainment touchscreen dominates the dash and is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon processor and responds very promptly to input.

Like the central display, the 10.2-inch instrument cluster has been reskinned with Mazda-specific graphics, but the user experience remains more Chinese-centric. However, the inclusion of a head-up display is a positive move, as is Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

One frustration with the Mazda 6e is the angle of the infotainment screen. It’s tilted up and away from the driver, meaning it can be hard to see in the wrong light.

The Mazda gains an audio advantage with its 14-speaker Sony sound system, yet it doesn’t quite produce the acoustic delights you might expect. It’s good, rather than great. Other than that, both provide sat-nav (vital for Tesla’s FSD), Bluetooth, voice activation and USB ports.

The Model 3 gains dual wireless charge pads compared to the single unit in the 6e.

Tesla has always offered a great level of remote access via its app, and that continues here. However, the Mazda isn’t outclassed. You can use your smartphone as the key for both, while setting the climate control and checking the charge or lock status can be done via the respective apps.

Both accept over-the-air (OTA) updates and offer vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability, adding a pragmatic level of flexibility and future-proofing in a world where tech is advancing very rapidly.

While this pair are their respective base grades, you wouldn’t know it from the swift performance they offer underfoot. Each harnesses a single rear-mounted electric motor that drives the rear wheels alone.

The 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD has the ascendancy, though. It’s little wonder the Tesla is 1.1 seconds faster to 100km/h given its lighter kerb weight and outputs of 208kW and 350Nm. There’s really no need for more performance than this, given how it leaps from a standstill and surges when overtaking.

Not only is the 2026 Mazda 6e a bigger car dimensionally, but it also weighs more than two tonnes. On top of that, its e-motor produces lower figures of 190kW and 290Nm. Still, it’ll hustle the family to 100km/h in 7.3sec – which is more than sprightly enough – and can just about keep the Tesla within its sights.

Of course, there aren’t any traditional engine sounds to be heard here. Instead, the Mazda 6e produces a rather annoying gravelly noise up to 30km/h, while you can opt in to further aural fakery through the settings, too.

Considering the 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD and Mazda 6e GT are likely to be used as family chariots, how far they can go on a single charge is important. And both will outlast the attention span of any kids in the back.

With the new entry-level Tesla Model 3 running exclusively on 18-inch steel wheels, Tesla has revised its range up to 572km (WLTP) thanks to the smaller rolling stock and low rolling resistance Giti tyres. It draws power from a 62.5kWh LFP battery pack, which is smaller than its rival’s.

The Mazda’s 78kWh LFP battery almost dwarfs the Tesla’s. However, the 6e is 247kg heavier and rolls on 19-inch alloys (wrapped in high-quality Michelin e-Primacy tyres), so its overall range comes in slightly lower at 560km.

Those extra kegs on the scales show up in the energy consumption, too. The Tesla is remarkably efficient, with our figures showing an average of 13.0kWh/100km over a 300km test route.

However, with the conditions leaning more towards urban and highway over city, we’ve no doubt it could do even better.

A few trips in and around Melbourne (outside of the official testing) easily saw the figure come in around the 12.0 to 12.5kWh/100km mark. Mazda’s official claim of 15.9kWh/100km means it demands more current from its battery pack. Still, we managed to beat that by 0.5kWh/100km.

Mazda claws back some ground with faster DC charging. It can be replenished at up to 195kW compared to the Tesla’s 170kW, with a 10-80 per cent charge taking 24 minutes – two minutes faster than the Model 3 RWD. Both are capped at 11kW AC.

The Mazda 6e’s LED daytime running lights and tail-lights even choreograph a little dance to signify the start of the charging process.

While the Model 3 RWD doesn’t party in the same way, access to the Tesla Supercharger network is a boon. You can even have FSD navigate you to a station and park at a vacant unit.

Surprisingly frisky straight-line performance is one thing, but how easy and comfortable they are to live with will win over more buyers. Therefore, the 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD and Mazda 6e GT must stop, steer and ride in a capable, yet inoffensive manner.

Opting to save $9k on your Model 3 presents the first hurdle, as it isn’t fitted with the newfangled frequency selective dampers. On top of this, it rides on cheaper Giti tyres.

There’s no avoiding the fact the Model 3 RWD’s ride quality has taken a hit (pun intended).

You certainly feel the lumps and bumps underneath more with the fixed-rate damper arrangement. The firmer responses at low speeds also translate to the open road, but this is countered by an agile chassis that quells roll nicely and changes direction keenly.

No, it isn’t exactly a rear-wheel drive sports sedan, but that’s not the aim here.

However, Mazda has a reputation for ‘Zoom-Zoom’ and the previous, front-wheel-drive era of the Mazda6 set a high-water mark. The addition of the ‘e’ has muddied the waters though. Well, it’s more the 2015kg kerb weight that sees it treading water against the lithe 1768kg Model 3.

Sitting on the co-developed Changan EPA1 platform, the respected Japanese brand hasn’t simply slapped a Mazda badge on and called it a day.

The 6e runs a European-specific suspension tune, but against the Model 3 it can’t mask its heft. There’s decidedly less body control through bumpy corners, with the passive dampers not doing quite enough to suppress rebound.

Despite running bigger 19-inch alloys, the Mazda somewhat redeems itself in the CBD, as the 6e’s ride quality has a subtler side compared to the Tesla. It remains a little fussy over lumps and bumps, yet they aren’t felt or heard as much as in the Model 3. It’s also quieter on the open road, with noticeably less wind noise.

As for the controls, both have quick steering, but the Tesla’s hyperactive ratio can be off-putting to the uninitiated. It’s ultra direct – small inputs result in large changes in direction. Combined with the small-diameter steering wheel that places your hands awkwardly high, it can feel like you’re driving a computer game.

While also overzealous on turn-in, the Mazda’s steering adds a sliver of tactility and a more natural response. It’s a bit too light in Normal mode, but it can be ramped up in Sport – or configured that way in Individual mode.

Speaking of, the Tesla has Chill and Standard modes, with the former smoothing out the throttle calibration. The Mazda offers Normal, Sport and Individual modes, while the regeneration levels can be adjusted, too.

The Model 3’s brake pedal is somewhat wooden, while the 6e’s is soft initially. However, both are proficient at arresting speed and harvesting regen.

Proving the importance of direct comparisons, our reactions to the Mazda 6e’s driving dynamics have been more favourable in isolation. However, when pitted against a competent rival, it doesn’t feel as polished behind the wheel.

That said, both would benefit from adaptive dampers.

If you’re a stickler for buttons, it’s best you stop reading now. Physical window switches notwithstanding, this pair rely wholly on their respective touchscreens for operation.

The 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD takes it a step further via the on-screen gear selector and the absence of an instrument cluster. While the Mazda 6e GT has a more traditional steering-column-mounted selector (which includes cruise-control engagement), it also relies heavily on the screen.

Which means the Tesla isn’t alone in being an odd user experience.

Yes, you’ll need a little time to work them out, as neither is immediately familiar operationally. Having climate controls anchored to the bottom of the screen offers some reprieve, but they’re fiddly to use on the run in both.

Time and patience are required.

Despite its base being around nine years old, the inside of the Tesla Model 3 RWD remains minimalist and modern. Yes, you’ll notice some missing soft-touch materials on the door cards and the seats are now predominantly cloth, but many will appreciate the clutter-free, tech-forward nature. There’s also loads of storage.

While the Tesla trades on a Scandi-chic aesthetic, the Mazda 6e GT introduces a softer nuance. It generates a warmer environment that feels more inviting to spend time in – especially at night with its mood lighting. Mazda has been working hard of late to increase the luxe factor of its cabins, and the 6e largely hits the mark.

And that’s even without the Atenza’s bold Nappa leather.

However, poke around further and there are some missteps. The font on the multi-function steering wheel looks cheap and not very Mazda, while the graphics within each display aren’t as refined as the Tesla’s. A lower driving position in the 6e would also be appreciated.

Frustratingly, neither uses traditional exterior door handles for their frameless doors. Instead, they’re pop-out versions, with the Tesla’s causing more pain than the 6e GT’s.

At 4921mm long, 1890mm wide and 1485mm tall, with a wheelbase of 2895mm, the Mazda 6e almost rivals an FG X Ford Falcon for size. Dimensionally, the Mazda adds 201mm, 40mm, 45mm and 20mm to each of the respective measurements over the Model 3. It’s simply a bigger car.

Which makes the fact the Mazda doesn’t feel demonstrably more spacious inside a win for the well-packaged Tesla.

The 6e enjoys a marginal advantage in back-seat legroom, while headroom is on par. It’s a good thing both have rear air vents, as the Model 3’s shadeless glass roof does tend to heat up the rear seat on hot days.

On paper, the Model 3 wins the cargo-capacity war. It not only offers a 594-litre boot, but the water-tight ‘frunk’ delivers an additional 88L of space. That compares to the 337L boot and 72L frunk in the Mazda. But when we measured the boots, the Mazda had more generous dimensions.

The Tesla’s figure includes the under-floor cavity but neither comes with a spare wheel.

Also, not having a rear windscreen wiper is annoying. It’s more noticeable in the Mazda 6e given the rake of the glass in its liftback-style tailgate.

Oh, how times have changed. This pair might share a body style with the sedans we used to know and love, but their make-up is far removed.

The 2026 Mazda 6e GT is a lovely car. It does a lot of things right and the sum of its parts should draw in (rather than scare off) the Mazda fanbase. Crucially, those wanting to stick with Mazda and take the EV route now can.

Yet, despite the comprehensive (and successful) overhaul of the Chinese donor platform, the 6e is missing a bit of the secret sauce that’s made the Japanese brand so popular in Australia. There’s no one tangible element, it’s all in the undertones.

Whereas the 2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD is a Tesla through and through.

It continues to blaze its own polarising trail, one that diehard fans keep alight by being repeat customers. The user experience remains an oddity to the uninitiated, but as the sales charts attest, more and more punters are taking the plunge.

And it’s a dip into the ocean worth taking.

The Tesla is staggeringly energy efficient while being loaded with tech and performance at a price that’s hard to beat. Therefore, the Model 3 RWD claims a decisive win.

2026 Tesla Model 3 RWD at a glance:
Price: $45,900 (plus on-road costs)
Available: Now
Powertrain: Single permanent magnet synchronous motor
Output: 208kW/350Nm
Transmission: Single-speed reduction gear
Battery: 62.5kWh LFP
Range: 572km (WLTP)
Energy consumption: 12.8kWh/100km (tested)
Safety rating: Five-star (ANCAP 2025)

2026 Mazda 6e GT at a glance:
Price: $49,990 (plus on-road costs)
Available: Now
Powertrain: Single permanent magnet synchronous motor
Output: 190kW/290Nm
Transmission: Single-speed reduction gear
Battery: 78kWh LFP
Range: 560km (WLTP)
Energy consumption: 15.4kWh/100km (tested)
Safety rating: Five-star (ANCAP 2025)

Join the conversation at our Facebook page
Or email us at editor@carsales.com.au