
The 2026 Mitsubishi Triton Raider is the best MV Triton yet, but after a week with the Premcar-prepped hero ute, I was left with the impression it could’ve been even better and wondering how much secret sauce was held back for the upcoming Nissan Navara Warrior.
You’ll be able to read all about the Raider’s intricacies in my upcoming road test (stay tuned), but to summarise: it’s a bloody good ute that does everything better than its lesser stablemates (as well as the Isuzu D-MAX Blade which I was hugely disappointed in) without necessarily feeling like a class-leader.
It rides nicer, handles better, sits more securely on the road, looks better and will go further off-road straight out the box than any other Triton – as it should for $74,990 – but it also seems a bit flat-footed, especially outside of its preferred operating window.
Mitsubishi obviously wanted the Raider to be more capable than the garden variety Tritons, which it is, with the product team placing extra emphasis on high-speed unsealed touring, and it meets that brief beautifully… it just doesn’t feel as up on its toes as other utes.


Some of this comes down to the weighty steering, but I’d love a little more poise or even just feedback from the front end in terms of the suspension stroke at normal road speeds and on sealed surfaces.
Having driven the latest Nissan Navara – which is quite literally an MV Triton clone fitted with Monroe dampers tuned locally by none other than Premcar – at its national launch, I think I was expecting more from the Raider which uses similar Monroe hardware.
This in turn has me asking: was something held back from the Raider so it wouldn’t directly trouble the upcoming Nissan Navara Warrior… which Premcar has almost finished developing.
It’s an intriguing prospect that delves into the messy world of corporate interests and agreed terms and conditions, with the plot thickened by the fact Nissan went on-record in February confirming it didn’t want to share the Warrior project with Mitsubishi.


carsales understands however that neither brand has been involved or had a say in the other’s hero ute project, with Premcar simply being an independently commissioned shared resource with a great reputation for local development and plenty of platform familiarity.
So if the Raider has been held back or stopped short of its full potential, and it’s got nothing to do with avoiding overlap with the new Warrior, there are two plausible theories as to why, and they largely go hand-in-hand.
The first is budget: the Triton Raider is an entirely Australian proposition in that it was conceptualised, developed and is now produced locally – by Premcar – for Aussie consumers.
Engaging an external firm to develop and produce a vehicle outside of factory channels is expensive, meaning Mitsubishi Australia needed to walk a fine line between development budget and sales profit, especially with HQ watching from Japan.


The second is far more clear cut: there must be a more capable Triton still to come, almost certainly wearing a Ralliart badge and quite likely aimed upmarket toward the Ford Ranger Raptor.
A truly hot Triton has been on the radar for years now and even unofficially teased via the AXCR rally car, but Mitsubishi is yet to confirm such a vehicle, even though the local division is chomping at the bit for a fully-fledged Ralliart revival.
“We went with Raider as this initial foray into these upper emotional derivatives,” the brand’s general manager of product strategy, Bruce Hampel, told carsales last month.
“But we do have aspirations to bring Ralliart back…”
