The Jeep Compass, recently reintroduced to Australia in facelifted form, has scored poorly in the latest round of Euro NCAP crash safety testing.
Apparently unimpressed by a range of issues with the Jeep, Euro NCAP awarded the SUV just two stars for overall crash safety. Among a field of European and Asian compact SUVs tested by NCAP since 2009 — and under new guidelines — the Jeep scored lowest for adult protection by a significant margin, with a score of 61 per cent. The Dacia Duster, which is not sold in Australia, achieved 74 per cent in this test — the second lowest score.
In child safety the Jeep performed better, achieving 76 per cent, to beat the Range Rover Evoque (75%) and tie with the Mercedes GLK (also 76%). The Jeep's score of 23 per cent for pedestrian safety was five per cent lower than the Duster's, in the same category — with no other vehicle coping worse in this test. For Safety Assist, the Jeep achieved 43 per cent, beating the Duster in this test (29%), but nothing else.
Lenore Fletcher, Chrysler Australia's Director of Corporate Affairs, spoke with motoring.com.au this morning about the Jeep's rating.
"First and foremost, we truly believe that... the vehicle here would be an equivalent four-star [rating] in Australia," Fletcher said, referring to "modelling" that Chrysler Australia holds for the Compass.
Asked how Chrysler would respond to the low NCAP rating and whether the company would request Euro NCAP reassess the vehicle — perhaps with all the necessary data required — Fletcher advised that it was not her place to speak on behalf of Chrysler's head office in Auburn Hills. However, it was her opinion that "there is some room for discussion there."
Since Chrysler Australia is so certain the Compass can achieve a better result in ANCAP testing than Euro NCAP, would the importer arrange with the local testing authority to test the Compass in Australia?
"It's something that we're actually looking at, at the moment," says Fletcher. "We do believe that that vehicle — particularly the way that it's specified here in Australia — the integrity of the passenger cell itself should be rated more highly than that."
But an ANCAP test of the Compass could be some way off in the future, according to Fletcher.
"It's not a quick process to implement and it's not an inexpensive process to implement."
While the crash test result has come out of the blue, and Chrysler has been caught on the hop, Fletcher says that the company is not resigned to the Compass languishing behind in the SUV safety stakes.
"We won't be leaving it at that; we will be looking further into it."
Why Compass scored just two points
The following text reveals why Euro NCAP rated the Compass just two stars for safety. Lower extremities, the lack of a side-impact front airbag on the passenger side and the chance of serious chest injury in the event of a side impact all contributed to the 61 per cent figure for adult protection. According to the testing authority, lack of data from Chrysler didn't help matters and, while the Compass's seatbelt reminders were present, they didn't meet the standard required by Euro NCAP.Adult occupant
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies and the car was penalised. The Compass was tested with an optional side thorax airbag. In the side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflections indicated a high risk of serious chest injury, even with the airbag fitted, and the car scored no points in that test. In the side barrier test, the car scored maximum points. Euro NCAP has reviewed data supplied by Jeep and concludes that scoring in the side barrier test is not significantly affected by the airbag. The Compass is equipped with an active head restraint. This senses when the car has been struck and deploys the restraint to reduce the distance between the head and the restraint. However, Jeep did not provide evidence to demonstrate that the system operates robustly over a range of speeds and impact severities specified by Euro NCAP, so the system was tested 'passively', without deployment. Test results indicated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact.Child occupant
Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag cannot be disabled. The risks of using a rearward facing restraint in that seating position without first disabling the airbag were explained in an English-only label on only one side of the passenger sun visor.Pedestrian
The bumper scored no points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. The front edge of the bonnet also scored no points, offering poor protection in all areas tested. The bonnet provided good protection in some areas where a child's head might strike, but was poor or marginal in others. In those areas where an adult's head would strike, the bonnet was almost entirely poor. The rating of the Compass is limited to two stars by its performance in pedestrian protection.Safety assist
Electronic Stability Control is standard equipment. A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment for the driver and front passenger seats but did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements, and was not rewarded. A speed limitation device is not offered on the Jeep Compass.How rivals fared in Euro NCAP testing since 2009
Of the compact SUVs tested by Euro NCAP since 2009, only the Jeep Compass and the Mazda CX-7 scored less than five stars. The Mazda was rated at four stars. In the table below, models sold by prestige brands have been left out, as is the Dacia Duster, which is not sold in Australia.
Model |
Adult |
Child |
Pedestrian |
Safety Assist |
Jeep Compass |
61 |
76 |
23 |
43 |
Chevrolet (Holden) Captiva |
88 |
82 |
48 |
71 |
Hyundai ix35 |
90 |
88 |
54 |
71 |
Kia Sportage |
93 |
86 |
49 |
86 |
Mazda CX-7 |
76 |
79 |
43 |
71 |
Volkswagen Tiguan |
87 |
79 |
48 |
71 |
Read the latest news and reviews on your mobile, iPhone or PDA at carsales' mobile site...