NHTSA dampens down Volt fire saga

Holden has today issued a statement concerning the decision by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to close its investigation of the Chevrolet Volt.

The investigation arose out of a fire in a Volt that had been left in a yard for as much as three weeks after being subjected to crash testing by NHTSA. Widely reported in the US, the incident led to the car company arguing that the NHTSA employees tasked with testing the Volt had not disconnected the large, T-shaped lithium-ion battery, in accordance with GM's own safety requirements for any example of the Volt involved in a serious crash.

Despite that, GM has voluntarily introduced improved safety measures to ensure another such incident won't occur. The engineering changes proposed by GM were presumably aimed at appeasing the NHTSA and encouraging closure of the investigation launched following the Volt going up in flames. For its part, the NHTSA may welcome any opportunity to put this sort of controversy behind it with what should be seen in the media and the community as a positive outcome.

In recent times the safety authority has been criticised for its lack of action over a number of years, in relation to Toyota's recall issues — although the instances of 'Unintended Acceleration' that led to Toyota's massive multi-million car recalls are now believed to be more likely the result of human error.

Holden has been on the front foot with this issue, since the company plans to sell the Volt in Australia badged as a Holden. Managing Director Mike Devereux offered his view during a preview of the Volt in Sydney last month — and Devereux didn't hold back.

"Yes, we have had issues that the NHTSA organisation in the US has found, in terms of fires.

"In the process of getting these crash tests [carried out, NHTSA conducted] a side-impact crash test... and in that side-impact crash test the battery pack was intruded. The car sat for three weeks in a yard — and it caught fire.

"The fire extinguished itself. By 'caught fire', the battery pack actually began to combust with fluids and what not. The issue in that particular instance is that after the crash test, which was a very violent crash test, the car was not de-powered. And that's something that I think NHTSA is learning.

"But frankly, I think it speaks to the newness of electric cars in general. Protocols for what happens after an accident are going to have to be more widely known, and established all around the world. This is not really a GM or a Volt issue. It's a lithium-ion chemical reaction issue.

"NHTSA and those kinds of places all around the world are going to have to figure those protocols out. General Motors is very proactively working with NHTSA to figure out what types of protocols and modifications need to be made, but the Volt is an extremely safe vehicle."

Not only did the company release its own GM-drafted statement this morning, but also provided a link to the statement issued by the NHTSA. The GM statement is published below:

In its statement, the NHTSA skirts around the issue of its own employees' possible negligence, and simply welcomes GM's announced engineering changes to improve the battery's resistance to side-impact damage.

Read the latest news and reviews on your mobile, iPhone or PDA at carsales' mobile site...